معرفت فلسفی

 

In the name of Allah

Ma‘rifat-i Falsafi Vol. 7, No. 4

A Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Inquiry Summer 2010

A publication by Imām Khomeini Institute for Education and Research

Editor in Chief: Ali Mesbah

Editor: Rizā Akbariān

Coordinator: Rūhollāh Farīsābādi

Editorial Board:

Dr. Ahmad Ahmadi: Professor, Tehran University

Dr. Rizā Akbarīyān: Associate professor, Tarbīyat Mudarris University

Dr. Ghulām-Rizā A‘wāni: Professor, Shahid Beheshti University

Dr. Muhammad Fanā'i: Associate Professor, Imām Khomeini Inst. for Education and Research

Hoj. Ghulām-Rizā Fayyāzi: Professor, Imām Khomeini Inst. for Education and Research

Dr. Hussain Ghaffāri: Associate Professor, Tehran University

Hoj. Muhammad husainzādeh: Associate Prof., Imām Khomeini Inst. for Education and Research

Dr. Muhsin Javādi: Associate Professor, Qum University

Dr. Muhammad Legenhausen: Associate Professor, Imām Khomeini Inst. for Education and Research

Dr. Muhammad Sa‘īdi Mehr: Assistant Professor, Tarbīyat Mudarres University

You may access this journal on the web at www.ricest.ac.ir and www.sid.ir

Address: Ma‘rifat-i Falsafi, PO Box: 37165—186

#11, Gulestan 2, Gulestan St., Tel: (251)2936008 & 2936054

Amin Blvd., Qum, Iran Fax: (251) 2934483

E-mail: marifat@qabas.net

Ma‘rifat-i Falsafi is a quarterly journal of philosophical inquiry, dedicated to research in philosophy. This journal covers issues concerning the comparison, critique, and analysis of the foundations and ideas of Muslim philosophers, as well as the juxtaposition, scrutiny, and evaluation of theories articulated by Muslim and non-Muslim philosophers. Academically exploring novel and unprecedented issues in comparative philosophy is among the aims of this journal.

Valuing your philosophical thoughts and reflections, we cherish your criticisms and comments in order to improve the journal in all aspects. Please send your manuscripts to the editor, and your notes and suggestions to the coordinator.

Articles published herein, reflect only the viewpoints of their respected authors.

Citing material from this journal is allowed, Provided that its Source is mentioned.

Subscriptions: Individual issues are 6000 Rls., and yearly subscription is 24000 Rls. Payable to the banking account # 0105075269000, Melli Bank, Imam Khomeini Institute Branch (Code 2723). Please send a copy of your receipt along with the subscription information.

Table of Contents

Editor’s Foreword

The Nature of Designation: Between the Prevalent View and that of Ayatollah Fayāzi / Mehdi Borhān Yazdi and Gholamrezā Fayyāzi

Objective Proposition in the Logic of the Omission of Identity and the Second Order Logic of Henkin / Asadullāh Fallāhi

Natural Universal: a Comparison between Ibn Sina and Mullā Sadrā / Rizā Akbariān and Zahrā Mahmūd-kelāyeh

The Footprints in the Islamic Philosophical Tradition of a Modern Solution to the Liar Paradox / Sayed Muhammad-Ali Hojati and Muhammad Sāleh Zāre‘pūr

Experience and the Difference between A Priori and A Posteriori Knowledge / Sayed Ali Ṭāheri Khoramābādi

“Ideas” in Shaykh Ishrāq with an Eye to Plato’s “Ideas” / Murtazā Rezā’i and Sayed Yadullāh Yazdānpanāh

An Inquiry into Existence and Being in Hegel

Mansūr Mahdavi and Muhamad Javad Sāfiyān

Abstracts

ABSTRACTS

The Nature of Designation: Between the Prevalent View and that of Ayatollah Fayāzi

Mahdi Borhān Yazdi 1

Gholamrezā Fayyāzi2

The prevalent view among epistemologists about “mental forms” is that they designate things by essence and in actuality. Ayatollah Fayyaḍi accepts this idea, but renders such a designation an instance of knowledge by presence and has a different view about the designator.

The authors in this article try to compare the two theories and analyze their commonalities as well as their differences. Fayyaḍi believes that the designator is not the mental form, but the soul of the perceiving agent. He thinks that the designator of the objective things shows subjective designator, objective designator, and all its instances at the same time, and this is the implication of designation by essence. He introduces knowledge be presence as the source by which one can understand the mode of such a designation and all its attributes, and suggests that by esoteric analysis one can find out about such matters. Although he renders the designation of simple concepts, propositions, and judgments essential to them, he thinks that there are differences in the way of their designation.

Keywords: Designation, Designated, Designator, By Essence, Subjective Mode, Mental Form.

Objective Proposition in the Logic of the Omission of Identity and the Second Order Logic of Henkin

Asadullāh Fallāhi 3

The author of the article has already analyzed Objective and verity propositions (القضایا الحقیقیة) within the framework of modern logic. In one of them, he uses modern modal logic for formalizing verity propositions, and in the second one, he uses the undefined predicate of existence for formulating objective propositions. The second article introduced some definitions for existence in identity logic and in second-order logic, but was unable to use such definitions in its analysis of the objective propositions.

In this article, basic flaws in identity logic as well as second-order logic in the analysis of objective propositions are shown, and a weaker logic, called “the logic of the omission of identity” is suggested which is believed to be able to express objective propositions. Furthermore, a weaker logic, compared to the standard second-order logic, called “second-order logic of Henkin” is employed, and its ability to formulate objective propositions is demonstrated. It argues for the idea that logic of Henkin is congruent with primary intelligibles, while standard logic is harmonious with secondary intelligibles.

Keywords: Objective Proposition, Standard Second-order Logic, Second-order Logic of Henkin, Primary Intelligibles, Secondary Intelligibles, Logic of the Omission of Identity.

Natural Universal: a Comparison between Ibn Sina and

Mullā Sadrā

Rizā Akbariān 4

Zahrā Mahmūd-kelāyeh 5

The inquiry about the mode of the existence of natural universal, or quiddity, can be regarded as one of the complexities in the philosophies of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. Natural universal has a different definition and consequences in the structure of each one of the two philosophies. To ignore such differences may cause numerous mistakes. Non-conditioned quiddity is nothing other itself, and this is while Ibn Sina claims that such a quiddity (natural universal) has objective existence. The question arises as to how it is possible for the non-conditioned reality to exist without losing its attribute as being non-conditioned.

The authors in this article want to show that Ibn Sina has left some questions unanswered in his treatment of the issue of the mode of being natural universal enjoys, and Mulla Sadra has tried to find a justified answer to such problems without contradicting his most essential theory of the principality of existence. The article argues for the superiority of Mulla Sadra’s theory and the way it is congruent with the theory of the principality of existence.

Keywords: Ibn Sina, Mulla Sadra, Natural Universal, Quiddity, Principality of Existence, Non-conditioned.

The Footprints in the Islamic Philosophical Tradition of a Modern Solution to the Liar Paradox

Sayed Muhammad-Ali Hojati 6

Muhammad Sāleh Zāre‘pūr 7

Stephen Read has tried, in the recent decade, to suggest a new solution to the Liar Paradox by proposing a new theory of truth. He criticized Tarski’s truth theory and suggested a new theory instead. By applying his theory, Read concluded that the liar sentence is false without any contradiction.

The author in this article tries to show the similarities of Read’s approach to that of Athir al-din Abhari.

Keywords:Stephen Read, Liar Paradox, Athir al-din Abhari, Tarski’s Theory.

Experience and the Difference between A Priori and A Posteriori Knowledge

Sayed Ali zāheri Khoramābādi8

Despite all the disagreements about the definition of A priori knowledge, all philosophers seem to agree on the major role “experience” plays in its difference with A posteriori knowledge, and the idea that the degree of this role in the justification of knowledge is the basis for such a division. Obviously, to determine the limits of experience is essential for explaining such distinction. There is also a question to be answered as to whether it is possible to have both a priori and a posteriori knowledge of one proposition. In other words, whether being a priori or a posteriori is rooted in the proposition itself, or external elements determine the suitable source of justification? It is held by most of the contemporary epistemologists that there is no contradiction involved in having both a priori and a posteriori knowledge of one proposition.

The author in this article tries to first explain the meaning of experience, and secondly, to argue that the root of the distinction between the two types of knowledge is in the propositions themselves, and it is impossible to have both kinds of knowledge of one proposition.

Keywords: A Priori Knowledge, A Posteriori Knowledge, Experience, Justification, Proposition, Universal.

“Ideas” in Shaykh Ishrāq with an Eye to Plato’s “Ideas”

Murtazā Rezā’i9

Sayed Yadullāh Yazdānpanāh10

The Theory of Ideas suggested by Plato has had a great impact on different fields of philosophical discussion because it suggests a wider universe including being with a distinctive feature. Shaykh Ishrāq, Shahābuddin Suhrawardi sympathized with this theory. He gives a determining place to “ideas” in his ontological system and tries to establish it through firm arguments. He also makes all his efforts to give this theory a more plausible and more rational structure by explaining the relation of the world of ideas with its superior and inferior worlds.

This article is an inquiry into the definition and nature of ideas from the viewpoint of Plato and Shaykh Ishrāq, the latter’s arguments for establishing such a world, and the place of this theory in the ontological system of the two thinkers. The main objective of the author, however, has been to investigate about Suhrawardi’s point of view; therefore, Plato’s theory has been discussed in order to show the commonalities and the differences between the two theories.

Keywords: Ideas, Theory of Ideas, Plato, Shaykh Ishrāq, Suhrawardi, Ontological System.

An Inquiry into Existence and Being in Hegel

Mansūr Mahdavi11

Muhammad Javād Sāfiyān 12

Existence is one of the most basic concepts in the philosophy of Hegel as it is a starting point in his logic. This article inquires about this important concept in the thought system of Hegel.

The authors discuss Hegel’s idea about the unity of existence and consciousness, its abstract nature because of the rules governing Hegel’s triads, and Hegel’s arguments for existence being a primary concept. They will look into his justifications for building other concepts on this basis, as well as his divisions for existence. The way Hegel differentiates between existence and being is another issue to be discussed in this article. The authors also criticize Hegel’s ideas in these regards.

Keywords: Hegel, Existence, Being, Absolute Idea, Divisions of Existence, Existence and Definite Being.

---

1 M.A. in Philosophy, Imam Khomeini I.E.R.:

2 Professor, Imam Khomeini I.E.R. Received: 2010/3/7 Accepted: 2010/5/9

3 Assistant Professor, Zanjan University: falahiy@yahoo.com

Received: 2009/10/7; Accepted: 2010/6/10

4 Associate Professor, Tarbiyat Modares University. Received: 2010.2.8 Accepted: 2010.3.18

5 Ph.D. Student of Islamic Philosophy, Tarbiyat Modares University: z.kelayeh@yahoo.com

6 Associate Professor, Tarbiyat Modarres University: hojaima@modares.ac.ir

7 M.A. Student of Philosophy, Tarbiyat Modarres University: zarepour@modares.ac.ir

Received: 2009.11.2 Accepted: 2010.3.4

8 Assistant Professor, Imam Khomeini I.E.R.: alitaheri@qabas.net

Received:2010.4.19 Accepted: 2010.7.18

9 Ph.D. Student of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini I.E.R; mortaza.rezaei.h@gmail.com

10 Assistant Professor, Bāqir al-‘Ulūm University Received:2009.5.10 Accepted: 2009.12.16

11 M.A. Student of Philosophy, Isfahan University: Mahdavi.mnsr@gmail.com

12 Assistant Professor, Isfahan University; Received:2010.1.25 Accepted: 2010.7.10