Ma`rifat Falsafi

This paper aims to uncover the divergences between the perspectives of Hegel and Rumi regarding the concept of ‘the Absolute’. To this end, it first examines the concept of ‘the Absolute’ and its cases in various contexts from a Hegelian perspective. According to Hegel, ‘the Absolute’ appears in logic, nature, and spirit. The usage of ‘the Absolute’ in ‘spirit’ is predicated upon several triads (the three dialectical stages of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis), which ultimately culminate in the Absolute Idea. According to the Hegelian viewpoint, the progression through these various triads leads to ‘the Absolute’, a view that suggests his underlying ontological monism. Hegel himself acknowledges the significance of this matter in his works, conceding that Rumi is a pioneering figure in this regard. Therefore, we aim to compare Rumi’s ‘Breath of Clemency’ with Hegel’s ‘the Absolute’, since the ‘Breath of Clemency’ is also based on a holistic view of being. By defining the ‘Breath of Clemency’ and describing how it manifests in both divine and created determinations, we will demonstrate the extent of the similarities between Hegel’s and Rumi’s views. However, there seem to be many differences between these two thinkers concerning the simplicity, creation, and other aspects of ‘the Absolute’.